Central District of California • 5:26-cv-00580
Ruben Adiel Nunez Rodriguez v. Warden
Active
Case Information
Filed: February 09, 2026
Assigned to:
David O. Carter
Referred to:
Maria A. Audero
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
February 27, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 09, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41467787 for $5 filing fee, filed by Plaintiff Ruben Nunez Rodriguez. (Attorney Mitchell Hsih-Fui Shen added to party Ruben Nunez Rodriguez(pty:pla))(Shen, Mitchell) (Entered: 02/09/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Feb 09, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ruben Nunez Rodriguez. (Shen, Mitchell) (Entered: 02/09/2026)
Main Document:
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#3
Feb 10, 2026
Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form
Main Document:
Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form
#4
Feb 11, 2026
Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition
Main Document:
Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition
#5
Feb 23, 2026
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)
#6
Feb 23, 2026
Answer to Complaint
Main Document:
Answer to Complaint
#7
Feb 25, 2026
Reply
Main Document:
Reply
#8
Feb 26, 2026
Report and Recommendation (Issued)
Main Document:
Report and Recommendation (Issued)
#9
Feb 26, 2026
SCHEDULING NOTICE TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Either party may file objections to this Court's findings and recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). By Local Rule, the objections period in a case involving a person in custody is presumptively 20 days. See L.R. 72-3.4. However, the Court finds that a shortened objection period is warranted here given the nature of the relief at issue. See United States v. Barney, 568 F.2d 134, 136 (9th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (holding that a district court has the discretion to shorten the objection period). Accordingly, the parties must submit any objections to this Report and Recommendation on or before March 5, 2026. 8 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mmc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/26/2026)
Feb 26, 2026
Generic Text Only Entry
#10
Feb 27, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#11
Feb 27, 2026
Response in Support of Motion
Main Document:
Response in Support of Motion
Parties
Attorneys office
Party
Nunez Rodriguez
Party