Western District of New York • 6:26-cv-06172
Ramirez Gonzalez v. Rhoney
Completed
Case Information
Filed: February 08, 2026
Assigned to:
Elizabeth Ann Wolford
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: March 06, 2026
Last Activity:
March 06, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Feb 08, 2026
Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5710213.), filed by Alcibiades Lazaro Ramirez Gonzalez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A - I-213, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B Order of Release on Recognizance, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C- NTA, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Order of IJ, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit E- BIA Appeal Receipt)(McLean, Siana) (Entered: 02/08/2026)
Main Document:
Emergency PETITION
#2
Feb 09, 2026
CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS by Alcibiades Lazaro Ramirez Gonzalez. Civil Cover Sheet filed by Alcibiades Lazaro Ramirez Gonzalez. (McLean, Siana) (Entered: 02/09/2026)
Main Document:
CONTINUATION
#3
Feb 09, 2026
TEXT ORDER re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This Court has issued Decision and Orders in Quituizaca Quituisaca v. Bondi, et al., No. 25-cv-6527, 2025 WL 3264440 (W.D.N.Y Nov. 24, 2025) and Lieogo v. Freden, et al., No. 6:25-CV-06615 EAW, 2025 WL 3290694 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025), finding that noncitizens who are present in the United States without having been admitted or paroled are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) but instead are subject to detention under section 1226. In addition, this Court issued Decision and Orders in Ivonin v. Rhoney, et al., No. 6:25-CV-06673 EAW, 2026 WL 199283 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2026) and Ab-Rahim v. Marich, No. 6:26-CV-06005-EAW, 2026 WL 279113, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2026), holding that the detention of noncitizens following expiration of parole is also governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226, and not § 1225. The Court has also concluded based on the circumstances in these cases and a balancing of the factors under Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), that due process requires the burden to be on the government at the bond hearing to establish dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence. See, e.g., Lieogo, 2025 WL 3290694, at *4-5. In deciding whether the government has met their burden of proof, the IJ must consider whether less-restrictive alternatives to detention can reasonably address the government's interest in continued detention and if the IJ finds that the government has not met this burden, then in setting any bond the IJ must consider ability to pay and alternative conditions of release. Id.Accordingly, Respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before February 17, 2026, why, in light of those decisions, the petition in this case should not be granted to the extent that it seeks an order requiring that Petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, Petitioner's ability to pay.In addition, the Court temporarily enjoins Respondents from transferring Petitioner outside this District pending a resolution of the petition because the Court finds that Petitioner's presence in the District is necessary to support the Court's resolution of the issues in the petition, including because it will enable Petitioner to fully participate in these proceedings and maintain adequate access to legal counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("Unless the application for the writ and the return present only issues of law the person to whom the writ is directed shall be required to produce at the hearing the body of the person detained. The applicant or the person detained may, under oath, deny any of the facts set forth in the return or allege any other material facts."). This temporary order extends to the transfer of Petitioner outside the country so as to maintain the status quo and solely so that the Court can make an informed decision about its authority to issue relief and whether any relief that it has the power to issue should be granted.Further, the Clerk's Office is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this Text Order electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the United States Attorney's Office, Western District of New York at USANYW-Immigration-Habeas@usdoj.gov. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 02/09/2026. (JKS)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 02/09/2026)
Feb 09, 2026
E-Filing Notification: 1 Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5710213.), filed by Alcibiades Lazaro Ramirez Gonzalez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A - I-213, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B Order of Release on Recognizance, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C- NTA, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Order of IJ, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit E- BIA Appeal Receipt)(McLean, Siana) ACTION REQUIRED: Civil Cover Sheet name does not match the name on the petition. Refile correct document using the Continuation of Exhibits event located under Responses and Replies. (DDS)
Feb 09, 2026
Remark: Case assigned to Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford. Notification to chambers of online case opening. (DDS)
Feb 09, 2026
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (DDS)
Feb 09, 2026
Clerk emailed 1 Petition to USANYW-Immigration-Habeas@usdoj.gov. (TF)
#4
Feb 11, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam A. Khalil on behalf of Todd Lyons, Tammy Marich, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#5
Feb 11, 2026
REPLY/RESPONSE to re 3 Text Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Todd Lyons, Tammy Marich, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY/RESPONSE
#6
Feb 11, 2026
ORDER granting 1 petition to the extent Petitioner seeks a bond hearing. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 02/11/2026. (JKS) (Entered: 02/11/2026)
Main Document:
ORDER
#7
Feb 20, 2026
Letter filed by Todd Lyons, Tammy Marich, Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney re bond hearing. (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 02/20/2026)
Main Document:
Letter
#8
Feb 20, 2026
CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS to 7 Letter (bond hearing order). (Khalil, Adam) (Entered: 02/20/2026)
Main Document:
CONTINUATION
#9
Feb 23, 2026
TEXT ORDER. On February 20, 2026, Respondents informed the Court that a bond hearing was held and bond was set. (Dkt. 7). The Court views the issues raised by the petition as now resolved and intends to direct the Clerk's Office to close the case, unless on or before March 2, 2026, either party objects. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 02/23/2026. (JKS) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
#10
Mar 05, 2026
TEXT ORDER. On February 11, 2026, the Court granted Petitioner's petition (Dkt. 1) to the extent it seeks a bond hearing (Dkt. 6). On February 20, 2026, Respondents informed the Court that a bond hearing was held and bond was set. (Dkt. 7). The Court issued a Text Order on February 23, 2026, directing the parties to inform the Court on or before March 2, 2026, if any matters in the petition remained unresolved and to date nothing has been filed. (Dkt. 9). Accordingly, the Court dismisses any remaining claims in the petition without prejudice and directs the Clerk of Court to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 03/05/2026. (JKS)Clerk to Follow up (Entered: 03/05/2026)
#11
Mar 06, 2026
JUDGMENT in favor of Alcibiades Lazaro Ramirez Gonzalez against Kristi Noem, Philip Rhoney, Tammy Marich, Todd Lyons. Signed by Clerk of Court on 3/6/2026. (TF) (Entered: 03/06/2026)
Main Document:
JUDGMENT
Parties
Ramirez Gonzalez
Party
Rhoney
Party