Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01085

#1

Feb 08, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against all Respondents by Simon Jose Manuel Osorio Ortega. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12873615) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Venezuelan Passport, # 3 Exhibit ICE Detainee Locator, # 4 Exhibit USCIS Account Summary (TPS), # 5 Exhibit TPS Approval Notices Since 2021, # 6 Exhibit AUSA Email Declining Immediate Release Evaluation, # 7 Exhibit TRO Grant for Similar Case)(Bautista, Cynthia) (Entered: 02/08/2026)

#2

Feb 08, 2026

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Simon Jose Manuel Osorio Ortega for attorney Marlon Bayas to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ACAEDC-12873631) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bautista, Cynthia) (Entered: 02/08/2026)

#3

Feb 09, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/16/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

#4

Feb 09, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Arelis M. Clemente, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Arelis M. Clemente, GOVT for Pamela Jo Bondi,Arelis M. Clemente, GOVT for Christopher Chestnut,Arelis M. Clemente, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Arelis M. Clemente, GOVT for Kristi Noem (Clemente, Arelis) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

#5

Feb 09, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

#6

Feb 10, 2026

Order on Application for Pro Hac Vice

#7

Feb 11, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

#8

Feb 11, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#9

Feb 11, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/11/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); See also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 2/13/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior Orders listed above. In addition, as to Count One of the Petition, Respondents shall address why Petitioner's detention is not unlawful under 8 U.S.C. 1254a(d)(4) in light of the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Nat'l TPS All. v. Noem, No. 25-5724, 2026 WL 226573, at *16-18 (9th Cir. Jan. 28, 2026), which affirmed a District Court's finding that Respondent Secretary Noem exceeded her statutory authority by revoking Temporary Protected Statues protections for Venezuelans. Petitioner may file a Reply by 2/17/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

#10

Feb 11, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

Feb 11, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#11

Feb 13, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#12

Feb 17, 2026

TRAVERSE and OPPOSITION to 11 Motion to Dismiss by Simon Jose Manuel Osorio Ortega. (Bayas, Marlon) Modified on 2/20/2026 (KS). (Entered: 02/17/2026)

#13

Feb 26, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#14

May 01, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order

#15

May 08, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#16

May 29, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations AND Order on Motion to Dismiss

#17

May 29, 2026

Judgment