Western District of Kentucky • 4:26-cv-00069

Ma v. Woosley

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 06, 2026
Assigned to: Benjamin Beaton
Referred to: Henry Brent Brennenstuhl
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: February 23, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 06, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Thida Ma. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Summons) (DJT) (Entered: 02/06/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 06, 2026
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DJT) (Entered: 02/06/2026)
Main Document: Case Assignment
#3
Feb 06, 2026
MOTION for Amber Nicole Hallett to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, Receipt #300015115. by Petitioner Thida Ma (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (DJT) (Entered: 02/06/2026)
Main Document: Appear Pro Hac Vice
#4
Feb 06, 2026
NOTICE of Deficiency re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.Reason for Deficiency: Filing Fee not paid nor IFP Motion Filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 2/20/2026. (DJT) (Entered: 02/06/2026)
Main Document: Deficiency
#5
Feb 12, 2026
TEXT ORDER: In response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 2/17/2026, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Government should address the Petitioner's argument that her continued detention beyond six months, following her final order of removal, violates 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a), see Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), and whether the Court has jurisdiction to grant the Petitioner's request for "an injunction requiring ICE to give her at least 14 days' notice after identifying a third country for removal." DN 1 at 2. The Court also directs the parties to file, no later than 2/18/2026, a joint status report or separate letters advising the Court whether they seek a hearing or instead prefer that the Court set a briefing schedule and decide the petition on the papers. On first review, the petition doesn't seem to implicate any factual disputes necessitating an in-person hearing. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/26 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, Respondents (as directed) (HMC) (Entered: 02/12/2026)
#6
Feb 12, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document: Notice (Other)
#7
Feb 12, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Brennenstuhl for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Brennenstuhl may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, HBB-CM (HMC) (Entered: 02/12/2026)
Feb 12, 2026
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
Feb 12, 2026
Order - TEXT ONLY
#8
Feb 13, 2026
Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document: Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
#9
Feb 17, 2026
Response to Order to Show Cause
Main Document: Response to Order to Show Cause
#10
Feb 17, 2026
Status Report
Main Document: Status Report
#11
Feb 23, 2026
Reply
Main Document: Reply