District of Massachusetts • 1:25-cv-12585

#1

Sep 15, 2025

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11237206 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Luiz Fernando Monteiro Araujo. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Miranda, Annery) Modified on 9/15/2025: to edit docket text (EZG). (Entered: 09/15/2025)

#2

Sep 15, 2025

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Julia E. Kobick assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges. (SP) (Entered: 09/15/2025)

#3

Sep 15, 2025

General Order 19-02

#4

Sep 15, 2025

District Judge Julia E. Kobick: ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OR TRANSFER OF REMOVAL entered.The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than September 22, 2025. (Attachments: # 1 *SEALED* Appendix) (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 09/15/2025)

Sep 15, 2025

Notice of Case Assignment

#5

Sep 16, 2025

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and 4 Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay or Transfer of Removal mailed to Patricia Hyde, Todd Lyons and Kristi Noem on 9/16/2025. (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

#6

Sep 16, 2025

Status Report

#7

Sep 16, 2025

Notice of Appearance

Sep 16, 2025

Copy Mailed

#8

Sep 18, 2025

Notice - Other

#9

Sep 19, 2025

District Judge Julia E. Kobick: ELECTRONIC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE entered. The respondents are ORDERED to show cause, by September 22, 2025, why the petitioner should not be ordered returned to the District of Massachusetts for noncompliance with this Court's Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay or Transfer of Removal. Specifically, this Court ordered, on 5:14 p.m. on September 15, 2025, that the petitioner not be removed from the District of Massachusetts unless the respondents have provided 72 hours' notice of that removal. ECF 4, at 3-4. The respondents stated in a status report that the petitioner was transferred out of the District of Massachusetts by a plane that "depart[ed] before this Court" issued that order. ECF 6, at 1. But the respondents did not provide evidence to support their claim—namely, a declaration specifying when the plane took off or flight data records. The petitioner, on the other hand, has provided evidence tending to suggest that his flight did not take off until 5:58 p.m. on September 15, 2025—44 minutes after this Court entered its order. ECF 8, ¶ 2; ECF 8-1. Accordingly, the respondents' response to this Order to Show Cause shall include, among other things, records that clearly specify the flight number and aircraft for petitioner's flight to Buffalo, New York; and a manifest for that flight, including the exact time the plane took off from the District of Massachusetts and the exact time it landed in New York. (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

#10

Sep 19, 2025

Amended Document - NOT Motion

Sep 19, 2025

Order

#11

Sep 22, 2025

Notice of Appearance

#12

Sep 22, 2025

Response to Order to Show Cause

#13

Sep 22, 2025

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#14

Sep 23, 2025

Response by Luiz Fernando Monteiro Araujo to 12 Response to Order to Show Cause . (Song, Yong Ho) (Main Document 14 replaced on 9/23/2025) (EZG). Modified on 9/23/2025: document replaced at the request of counsel (NEF regenerated) (EZG). (Entered: 09/23/2025)

#15

Sep 24, 2025

District Judge Julia E. Kobick: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. In response to this Court's Order to Show Cause, ECF 9, the respondents filed a Declaration of Assistant Field Office Director Keith Chan, ECF 12-1. But, invoking the law enforcement privilege, the respondents did not, as required by the Order to Show Cause, include more specific flight data records. ECF 12, at 2. The respondents did, however, offer to submit those flight data records to the Court ex parte. Id. at 3. Accordingly, the respondents are ORDERED, by 12:00 p.m. on September 26, 2025, to submit to the Court, for ex parte review, those flight data records upon which Mr. Chan relied to support his statement that the petitioner's flight to New York "departed Bedford, Massachusetts at approximately 5:10 p.m. EST." ECF 12-1, ¶ 8. (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

Sep 24, 2025

Order

Sep 26, 2025

Order