Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-01002

#1

Feb 05, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Javier Alexander Rodriguez Salazar. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Brito, Christine) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#2

Feb 05, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Javier Alexander Rodriguez Salazar. Attorney Brito, Christine Yvette added. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brito, Christine) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#3

Feb 05, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Javier Alexander Rodriguez Salazar. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12863167) (Brito, Christine) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#4

Feb 05, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/12/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk OR) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#5

Feb 05, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Pamela Bondi,Anthony Andrews for Christopher Chestnut,Anthony Andrews for Todd M. Lyons,Anthony Andrews for Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#6

Feb 05, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#7

Feb 05, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deput for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/05/2026: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). (ECF No. 2 .) The Court has reviewed Petitioner's motion and finds Petitioner has met his burden establishing a TRO is warranted under the factors articulated in Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Petitioner has established: (1) a likelihood of success on his claims that Respondents violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; (2) Petitioner will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO; (3) the balance of equities tip in Petitioner's favor; and (4) a TRO is in the public interest. The Court has repeatedly ruled on the issues presented in the instant case. See, e.g., Morales-Flores v. Lyons, No. 1:25-CV-01640-TLN-EFB, 2025 WL 3552841, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2025). Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for TRO is GRANTED. (ECF No. 2 .) To return Petitioner to the status quo ante litem, Respondents are ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner under the same conditions he was released prior to his current detention. At the time of release, Respondents must return all of Petitioner's documents and possessions. Respondents are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, including seven-days' notice and a pre-deprivation hearing. Respondents are further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not grant the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter judgment in favor of Petitioner. Respondents shall file responsive papers by 02/12/2026. Petitioner may file a reply by 02/16/2026. The parties shall indicate whether they waive a hearing. Respondents may apply to the Court for modification or dissolution of the TRO on two days' notice to Petitioner. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(4). The bond requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) is waived. SO ORDERED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

Feb 05, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#8

Feb 11, 2026

RETURN to 3 Petition; RESPONSE and OPPOSITION to Injunctive Relief by All Respondents. (Andrews, Anthony) Modified on 2/17/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 02/11/2026)

#9

Mar 26, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#10

Mar 26, 2026

Judgment