Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00921

(HC) Mulazada v. Murray

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 02, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Dennis M. Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: February 09, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 02, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 02, 2026
NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jazmin Preciado on behalf of Mashal Mulazada. Attorney Preciado, Jazmin added. (Preciado, Jazmin) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#3
Feb 03, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/9/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Feb 03, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Ron Murray,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Kristi Noem (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
Feb 03, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Feb 03, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Mashal Mulazada. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Memorandum of Points and Authorities ISO Motion for TRO, # 2 Exhibit Exh. A - Declaration of Abby Sullivan Engen, # 3 Exhibit Exh. B - Declaration of Ahmed Samin Azizi, # 4 Exhibit TRO Checklist, # 5 Exhibit Proposed order - TRO, # 6 Exhibit Proposed order - bond)(Preciado, Jazmin) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#7
Feb 04, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/4/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 6 motion for temporary restraining order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 2/6/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 2/9/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the petition. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the petition and motion by email to the US Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioner's counsel shall do so by no later than 5:00 PM on 2/5/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 02/04/2026)
#8
Feb 04, 2026
OPPOSITION and REQUEST FOR ABEYANCE OR 180-DAY PERIOD OF TIME TO RESPOND to Petitioner's 6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Ron Murray, and Kristi Noem. (Williams, Jonathan) (Docket Text Modified on 2/5/2026 by CRS.) (Entered: 02/04/2026)
Main Document: OPPOSITION
Feb 04, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#9
Feb 05, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/5/2026: In Respondents' 8 Opposition to Petitioner's 6 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents continue to oppose issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order. However, Respondents acknowledge the decisions from this court in Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), D.L.C. v. Wofford, et al., 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, and acknowledge that this case is not distinguishable from those cases. Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Selis Tinoco and D.L.C., Petitioner's 6 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; (2) Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him, such as electronic monitoring, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing; and (3) If the Government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. Moreover, in light of Respondents' non-opposition to treating Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (See Doc. No. 8), and given that the standard for issuing a Temporary Restraining Order is "substantially identical" to the standard for issuing a Preliminary Injunction, Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001), the court hereby ISSUES a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms. This case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 02/05/2026)
Feb 05, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Feb 09, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings