Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00899

(HC) De La Paz Salazar v. Noem

Active

Case Information

Filed: February 02, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Sean C. Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity: February 24, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Feb 02, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Tanya Andrews, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security by Julian De La Rosa Gonzalez, Manuel Arrellano Ramirez, Gustavo De La Paz Salazar, Luis Lopez Vasquez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12844467) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Declaration)(Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Feb 02, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Manuel Arrellano Ramirez, Gustavo De La Paz Salazar, Julian De La Rosa Gonzalez, Luis Lopez Vasquez. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Mandatory TRO Checklist)(Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Feb 02, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/9/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#4
Feb 02, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Calvin Lee, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Tanya Andrews,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Christopher Chestnut,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Executive Office for Immigration Review,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Calvin Lee, GOVT for Kristi Noem,Calvin Lee, GOVT for U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Lee, Calvin) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
Feb 02, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Feb 02, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/2/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioners' 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Three of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court intends to rule directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); See also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 2/4/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior Orders listed above. Petitioners may file a Reply by 2/5/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Three only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioners to the relief sought in the Petition. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the Petition and Motion by email to the U.S. Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioners' Counsel shall do so by no later than 12:00 PM on 2/3/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
#7
Feb 02, 2026
CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Manuel Arrellano Ramirez, Gustavo De La Paz Salazar, Julian De La Rosa Gonzalez, Luis Lopez Vasquez re 6 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,, Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,,,,,. (Frenzen, Niels) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document: Certificate / Proof of Service
Feb 02, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#8
Feb 04, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document: Opposition to Motion
#9
Feb 05, 2026
Reply to Response to Motion
Main Document: Reply to Response to Motion
Feb 09, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#12
Feb 19, 2026
Exhibit
Main Document: Exhibit
#14
Feb 23, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
Main Document: Order on Motion for TRO
Feb 24, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Parties

(HC)De La Paz Salazar
Party
Noem
Party