Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00798

#1

Jan 30, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M Lyons, Kristi Noem by Shengsheng Chen. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12833785) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Proposed Order)(Gahra, Manpreet) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#2

Jan 30, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#3

Jan 30, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/5/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#4

Jan 30, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Joshua Banister, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Joshua Banister, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Joshua Banister, GOVT for Christopher Chestnut,Joshua Banister, GOVT for Todd M. Lyons,Joshua Banister, GOVT for Kristi Noem (Banister, Joshua) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#5

Jan 30, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#6

Jan 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/30/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Monday, 2/2/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address the impact of the court's decision in Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-cv-01873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3713987 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025) on this action, in particular whether petitioner is a member of the "Bond Eligible Class" certified in that order. Furthermore, respondents are directed to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order

Feb 03, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#11

Mar 10, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#12

Mar 10, 2026

Order to Show Cause

#14

Mar 16, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO