Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00600

#1

Jan 24, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem by Sangiovanni Reynoso Nunez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12804391) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Shah, Nilima) (Entered: 01/24/2026)

#2

Jan 24, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Sangiovanni Reynoso Nunez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit TRO Checklist)(Shah, Nilima) (Entered: 01/24/2026)

#3

Jan 26, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/2/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk EF) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#4

Jan 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/26/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in Count 2 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Singh v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-01543-DJC-SCR; Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before January 28, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before January 29, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. Petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED to send a copy of the petition, the motion, and this order as well as provide the Petitioner's full name and A number to the US Attorney's Office by January 26, 2026 at 3:00 P.M., at their email usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. Petitioner's Counsel shall file a such proof of service on the docket. Counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#5

Jan 26, 2026

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Sangiovanni Reynoso Nunez. Attorney Shah, Nilima Patel added.. Attorney Shah, Nilima Patel added as counsel of record. (Shah, Nilima) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#6

Jan 26, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#7

Jan 26, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

Jan 26, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#8

Jan 29, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/29/2026: On January 26, 2026, the Court issued an Order directing Respondents to file an Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, on or before January 28, 2026. (ECF No. 4 .) Respondents failed to file an Opposition. Accordingly, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before January 29, 2026, why Petitioner's Motion should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before February 2, 2026. Failure to file a response will be construed as non-opposition to the Court granting Petitioner's Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/29/2026)

#9

Jan 29, 2026

OPPOSITION by Respondents to 2 Injunctive Relief and Petition by Respondents re 1/26/2026 Minute Order. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 1/30/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 01/29/2026)

Jan 29, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#10

Feb 03, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Feb 03, 2026

Judgment