Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00597

#1

Jan 23, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Armando Aguilera Macias. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12803565) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Robert) (Entered: 01/23/2026)

#2

Jan 23, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Armando Aguilera Macias. (Attachments: # 1 Points and Authorities) (Myers, Robert) (Entered: 01/23/2026)

#3

Jan 26, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/2/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#4

Jan 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 1/26/2026: The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Respondents shall file any opposition to the 2 motion for temporary restraining order by January 30, 2026. The response shall provide the Court with copies of all referenced/relevant portions of petitioner's A-File, in addition to all of the following documents if they were provided to petitioner: (1) Form I-862, Notice to Appear; (2) any order granting or denying bond; and (3) any document authorizing parole. Petitioner may file a reply by February 3, 2026. The parties shall indicate in their briefing their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and whether they request a hearing. By January 26, 2026, to the extent not already accomplished, petitioner's counsel is directed: (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, the motion for temporary restraining order, the accompanying papers, petitioner's A #, and a copy of this Order, by e-mail to all appropriate recipients including the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, with a copy to usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov, and by overnight mail; and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. ORDER PREVENTING TRANSFER PENDING FURTHER COURT ORDER. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Voyles, J.) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#5

Jan 26, 2026

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Armando Aguilera Macias re 2 Motion for TROMotion for Preliminary Injunction, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Myers, Robert) (Entered: 01/26/2026)

Jan 26, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Jan 28, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Cody S. Chapple for Pamela Jo Bondi,Cody S. Chapple for Geo Group, Inc.,Cody S. Chapple for Polly Kaiser,Cody S. Chapple for Kristi Noem,Cody S. Chapple for Warden Golden State Annex (Chapple, Cody) (Entered: 01/28/2026)

#7

Jan 30, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Jo Bondi, Geo Group, Inc., Polly Kaiser, Kristi Noem, Warden Golden State Annex to 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DO Alejandro Parra Jaimes, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Chapple, Cody) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#8

Feb 03, 2026

RESPONSE by Armando Aguilera Macias to 7 Response,. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Myers, Robert) (Entered: 02/03/2026)

#9

Feb 23, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Attachment 1)(Anonymous) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

#10

Mar 23, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/23/2026: (Text Only Entry): The 2 motion for temporary restraining order is denied. Petitioner argues that his detention violates the Due Process Clause and requests that the Court order his release subject to a pre-deprivation bond hearing. But his motion indicates that he has already received at least one bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), as recently as January 20, 2026, and the immigration judge denied bond after finding that petitioner was a danger. See Doc. 2-1 at 3. In Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, the Ninth Circuit upheld § 1226(a)'s procedures as applied to a detainee, like petitioner, who was detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, 53 F.4th 1189, 1207-14 (9th Cir. 2022). Petitioner has received the process required by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), and his motion fails to explain how due process requires a further bond hearing. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings, including the preparation of findings and recommendations on the petition. (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 03/23/2026)

#11

Mar 23, 2026

Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Mar 23, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO