District of New Jersey • 2:26-cv-00717

GUAYLLAS-FAJARDO v. CABEZAS

Active

Case Information

Filed: January 22, 2026
Assigned to: Madeline Cox Arleo
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: May 28, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jan 22, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17022140.), filed by MIGUEL GUAYLLAS. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(STILLMAN, LINA) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jan 22, 2026
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. (jr)
Jan 22, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
#2
Jan 27, 2026
Affidavit of Service
Main Document: Affidavit of Service
#3
Jan 28, 2026
Show Cause
Main Document: Show Cause
#4
Feb 13, 2026
Order on Motion to Show Cause
Main Document: Order on Motion to Show Cause
#5
Feb 18, 2026
Substitution of Attorney
Main Document: Substitution of Attorney
#6
Feb 27, 2026
Response to Habeas Petition
Main Document: Response to Habeas Petition
#7
Apr 08, 2026
Letter
Main Document: Letter
#8
May 22, 2026
TEXT ORDER- The Court requires supplemental briefing resolve the Petition. On February 3, 2026, Petitioner received an order of expedited removal from the Immigration Court. The Order stated the following: "This is a final order. There is no appeal from this decision." (ECF No. 6-6 at 3.) The parties appear to assume that Petitioner is still detained under a pre-final order of removal, but Petitioner is now detained pursuant to a final order of removal, and, thus, his detention is governed by the post-removal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a). See Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371, 378-379 (2005)(extending the holding of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001) to inadmissible noncitizens.); see also Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 701 (finding the INA's post-removal-period detention provision of contains an implicit reasonableness limitation of six months, after which a noncitizen may not continue to be detained if "there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.") Petitioner is still within the six-month period. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the date of the entry of this Text Order, Petitioner shall address whether he can rebut the six-month presumption of reasonableness. Respondents may file and serve a reply to Petitioner's supplemental briefing within three (3) days after the response is filed. So Ordered by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 5/22/2026. (aa, ) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
May 22, 2026
Order
#9
May 28, 2026
Letter
Main Document: Letter