District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-10271

Barry v. Hyde

Active

Case Information

Filed: January 22, 2026
Assigned to: Angel Kelley
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: February 03, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jan 22, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11491515 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Hassane Barry. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nice, Robin) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Jan 22, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents- Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet. (FGD) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
#3
Jan 22, 2026
Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Hassane Barry. (Nice, Robin) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet
#4
Jan 22, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (NMC) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
#5
Jan 22, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CEH) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
#6
Jan 22, 2026
District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing Order Regarding Motion Practice. (CEH) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: Order
#7
Jan 22, 2026
District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition, Stay of Transfer or Removal, and Required Response. (CEH) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Main Document: Service Order-2241 Petition
#8
Jan 22, 2026
Copy re 7 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) emailed to AUSA Shawna Yen, Rayford Farquhar, Elona Toro, and USAMA Civil Process on 1/22/2026 at 4:22 PM and mailed to All Respondents (CEH) (Entered: 01/22/2026)
Jan 22, 2026
Copy Mailed
Jan 22, 2026
Notice - Other
Jan 22, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#9
Jan 27, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#10
Jan 27, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#11
Feb 02, 2026
Response - not related to a motion
Main Document: Response - not related to a motion
#12
Feb 02, 2026
Amended Complaint
Main Document: Amended Complaint
#13
Feb 03, 2026
District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Before the Court is Petitioner Hassane Barry’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Dkt. 1]. In his Petition, Barry made a single constitutional claim. He then filed a supplemental Petition, adding a statutory claim. [Dkt. 12 at 3]. Despite only initially making a constitutional claim, Respondents have stated "that the facts in this case are similar to those at issue in” [Dkt. 10 at 1] Amaya Sanchez v. Moniz et al., No. 25-CV-12806-AK (D. Mass. Oct. 10, 2025) [Dkt. 10], in which the Court joined other sessions of this Court, and other courts across the country, in holding that the arrest and detention of noncitizens within the United States is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Respondents continued, "should the Court follow a similar (but not the same) reasoning here as it did in Amaya Sanchez, it would reach the same result here with respect to Petitioner’s detention only." [Dkt. 11 at 1-2]. This is reinforced by the Petitioner's supplemental filing, which reported that an immigration judge determined he was subject to mandatory detention, contrary to the Court's finding in Amaya Sanchez and other cases. [Dkt. 12 at 3-4]. On the facts before it, the Court does not find reason to deviate from the similar analysis presented in Amaya Sanchez. Accordingly, Petitioner is subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226’s discretionary detention framework and, while the Court cannot order Respondents to release Barry "on his own recognizance or under parole, a low bond, or reasonable conditions of supervision" [Dkt. 1 at 4], he is entitled to a bond hearing.Petitioner’s Petition [Dkt. 1] is GRANTED in line with the Court's reasoning above. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within 10 calendar days of this Order. Respondents are ENJOINED from denying Petitioner bond on the basis that he is detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Respondents are ORDERED to file a status report within 14 calendar days of this Order stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial.In light of this Order, the Court finds it unnecessary to comment on Barry's request for an Order that he not be removed from Massachusetts pending the adjudication of the writ.(CEH) (Entered: 02/03/2026)
Feb 03, 2026
Order