Central District of California • 5:25-cv-01789

Jorge Arrazola-Gonzalez v. Kristi Noem

Active

Case Information

Filed: July 15, 2025
Assigned to:
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Administrative Procedures Act / Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity: August 15, 2025
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jul 15, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-40102203 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Jorge Arrazola-Gonzalez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Bond Denial) (Attorney Stacy Eva Tolchin added to party Jorge Arrazola-Gonzalez(pty:pet))(Tolchin, Stacy) (Entered: 07/15/2025)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
Attachment 1: Exhibit Bond Denial
#2
Jul 15, 2025
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Jorge Arrazola-Gonzalez, (Tolchin, Stacy) (Entered: 07/15/2025)
Main Document: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties
#3
Jul 18, 2025
Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form
Main Document: Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form
#4
Jul 18, 2025
Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening
Main Document: Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening
#5
Jul 18, 2025
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
Main Document: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#6
Aug 01, 2025
Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition
Main Document: Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition
#7
Aug 11, 2025
Amended Complaint/Petition
Main Document: Amended Complaint/Petition
#8
Aug 12, 2025
Temporary Restraining Order
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#9
Aug 14, 2025
Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
Main Document: Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
#10
Aug 15, 2025
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ANDORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 8 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Respondents shall provide each Petitioner with an individualized bond redetermination hearing before an immigration judge purs uant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven (7) days of this Order; Respondents are enjoined from relocating Petitioners outside of theCentral District of California pending final resolution of this case; and Respondents shall show cause in writing by no later than August 20, 2025, as to why the Court should not issue a preliminary injunction in this case. Petitioners may file a reply by August 22, 2025. The Court SETS a hearing on the preliminary injunction on August 26, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., via Zoom (lc)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order