Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00509

#1

Jan 21, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Kristi Noem by Cristian Jhoany Guzman Ruiz. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12788584) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

#2

Jan 21, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Cristian Jhoany Guzman Ruiz. (Attachments: # 1 Brief, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibits, # 4 Declaration, # 5 TRO Checklist, # 6 TRO Proposed Order, # 7 PI Proposed Order)(Salgado, Mario) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

#3

Jan 21, 2026

ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/23/2026. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

#4

Jan 21, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 1/21/2026: The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has addressed the legal issues raised by count one of the 1 petition on previous occasions. See e.g., R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01535-KES-EPG (HC), 2026 WL 40507 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2026); Omer G. G. v. Kaiser, No. 1:25-CV-01471-KES-SAB (HC), 2025 WL 3254999 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before January 26, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders in R.A.N.O. v. Wofford and Omer G. G. v. Kaiser and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. By 12 p.m. on January 22, 2026, to the extent not already accomplished, petitioner's counsel is directed: (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, the motion for temporary restraining order, the accompanying papers, and a copy of this Order, by e-mail to all appropriate recipients including the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, with a copy to usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov, and by overnight mail; and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Voyles, J.) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

Jan 21, 2026

Minute Order

#5

Jan 22, 2026

Certificate / Proof of Service

#6

Jan 26, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#7

Jan 27, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Stefanki, Sam) (Entered: 01/27/2026)

#8

Jan 27, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#9

Jan 27, 2026

Judgment

#10

Mar 14, 2026

Attorney Fees

Apr 06, 2026

Minute Order

Apr 07, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings