(HC) Oruc v. Chestnut

#1

Jan 20, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pam Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem by Oruc Hisyar. (Attachment(s): # 1 Declaration, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Balikci, Adem) (Entered: 01/20/2026)

Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Habeas RECAP PACER

#2

Jan 20, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/23/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk JJD) (Entered: 01/20/2026)

Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider

Habeas RECAP PACER

Jan 20, 2026

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12778792. (Balikci, Adem)

#3

Jan 23, 2026

Summons Returned Unexecuted

Main Document: Summons Returned Unexecuted

Habeas RECAP PACER

#4

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Main Document: Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Habeas RECAP PACER

#5

Jan 30, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order

Habeas RECAP PACER

#6

Jan 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 1/30/2026: After the Court issued its Minute Order at ECF No. 4, setting a schedule, petitioner filed a motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 5 ). Therefore, the Court withdraws its 1/30/2026 Minute Order at ECF No. 4 so the motion for temporary restraining order can be addressed by the assigned district judge. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk AW) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

#7

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Main Document: Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Habeas RECAP PACER

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#8

Jan 31, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 1/31/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 2/3/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), D.L.C. v. Wofford, et al., 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 2/4/2026. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the Petition and Motion by email to the U.S. Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioner's Counsel shall do so by no later than 12:00 PM on 2/2/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 01/31/2026)

Jan 31, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#9

Feb 02, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE by Hisyar Oruc re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 5 Motion for TRO; Affidavit of A. Balikci. (Balikci, Adem) Modified on 2/3/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 02/02/2026)

Main Document: PROOF

Habeas RECAP PACER

#10

Feb 02, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/02/2026)

Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE

Habeas RECAP PACER

#11

Feb 03, 2026

Opposition to Motion

Main Document: Opposition to Motion

Habeas RECAP PACER

#12

Feb 03, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 2/3/2026: In Respondents' 11 Opposition to Petitioner's 5 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents continue to oppose issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order. However, Respondents acknowledge the decisions from this court in Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), D.L.C. v. Wofford, et al., 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, and acknowledge that "[t]his case does not appear to present any factual or legal components distinguishing it materially from" those cases. Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Selis Tinoco and D.L.C., Petitioner's 5 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; (2) Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him, such as electronic monitoring, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing; and (3) If the Government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. Further, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than 2/10/2026, as to why this court should not issue a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms as this Order. Petitioner may file a response thereto by no later than 2/12/2026. Respondents may file a reply to Petitioner's response by no later than 2/13/2026. If the parties agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties proposal. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 02/03/2026)

#13

Feb 03, 2026

Summons Returned Executed