Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00314

#1

Jan 15, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Serigne Saliou Ndoye. Attorney Mousavi, Sahar added. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration Affidavit in support of existence of irreparable harm, # 2 Declaration Declaration Affidavit detailing notice, or efforts to effect notice, # 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order Proposed order with blanks for fixing, # 4 Proposed Order Proposed Order Proposed order with provision for bond, # 5 Proof of Service Proof of Service, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit TRO Checklist)(Mousavi, Sahar) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

#2

Jan 15, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Pam Bondi, Field Office Director, ICE ERO San Francisco, Kristi Noem, Warden, Golden State Annex by Serigne Saliou Ndoye. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12766517) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mousavi, Sahar) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

#3

Jan 15, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/20/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

#4

Jan 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 1/16/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 1/20/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), D.L.C. v. Wofford, et al., 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, Order, Doc. No. 12 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 1/21/2026. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the Petition and Motion by email to the U.S. Attorney's Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioner's Counsel shall do so by no later than 12:00 PM on 1/16/2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 01/16/2026)

Jan 16, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#5

Jan 20, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Respondents. (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/20/2026)

#6

Jan 20, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/20/2026)

#7

Jan 20, 2026

OPPOSITION 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Request to Dismiss the 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondents re Minute Order, ECF No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 1/21/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 01/20/2026)

#8

Jan 20, 2026

Reply to Response to Motion

#9

Jan 21, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 1/21/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents' 7 Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and Petitioner's 8 Reply thereto. As an Exhibit to their Opposition, Respondents attach Petitioner's immigration records, which reflect that Petitioner was detained by ICE in May 2025. (See Doc. No. 7-1.) Further, as reflected in the "Order of Immigration Judge" that Petitioner attached as an Exhibit to his Petition, the Immigration Judge's denial of Petitioner's request for custody redetermination was issued in July 2025. (See Doc. No. 2-1 at 20.) Petitioner does not address why he did not request emergency relief earlier, given that the events precipitating his request for relief took place over six months ago. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." On his [2-1] TRO Checklist, Petitioner indicates that there has been no undue delay in bringing this Motion, and that the Motion could not have been brought earlier, but states only that the "petition and motion were filed promptly after a new attorney was retained following ICE's continued detention and the Immigration Judge's order... which eliminated bond jurisdiction and made immediate intervention necessary." (See Doc. No. 2-1 at 188.) Petitioner does not otherwise address the six-month delay in seeking relief. Accordingly, the court DENIES Petitioner's 1 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, without prejudice, and REFERS this matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

Jan 21, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#10

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#11

Feb 04, 2026

Extension of Time

Feb 05, 2026

Minute Order