Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00215
(HC) Singh v. Albarran
Active
Case Information
Filed: January 12, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Dennis M. Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
February 10, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jan 12, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem by Pavitar Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12747073) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit, (4) Civil Cover Sheet). (Gahra, Manpreet) Modified on 1/12/2026 (CRM). (Entered: 01/12/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jan 12, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Pavitar Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Memorandum)(Gahra, Manpreet) (Entered: 01/12/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Jan 12, 2026
CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney Manpreet S. Gahra re 1 Civil Cover Sheet: Your document is not formatted properly, please flatten your PDF and re-file a properly formatted PDF. For information on how to flatten a pdf, please refer to our website under CM/ECF E-Filing > PDF Information > Page 7. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444. (Deputy Clerk EF) (Entered: 01/12/2026)
#4
Jan 12, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/17/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk EF) (Entered: 01/12/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#5
Jan 12, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/12/2026: Pending the issuance of the courts order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, no later than tomorrow, 1/13/2026, by 5:00 PM, petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of California by email at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov; and (2) to promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Wednesday, 1/14/2026. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties proposal. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 01/12/2026)
Jan 12, 2026
Minute Order
#6
Jan 13, 2026
Certificate / Proof of Service
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
#7
Jan 13, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gahra, Manpreet) (Entered: 01/13/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#8
Jan 14, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Christopher Chestnut,Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Todd M. Lyons,Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Kristi Noem (Hemesath, Audrey) (Entered: 01/14/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#9
Jan 14, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
#10
Jan 15, 2026
REPLY by Pavitar Singh re 9 Opposition to Motion. (Gahra, Manpreet) (Entered: 01/15/2026)
Main Document:
REPLY
#11
Jan 16, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/2026: On 1/12/2026, petitioner filed a motion for temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 2 ). On 1/14/2026, respondents filed an opposition the pending motion. (Doc. No. 9 ). Therein, respondents argue that petitioner is an "applicant for admission" subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), and that "[p]etitioner's prior release in the discretion of DHS does not have the effect of having converted petitioner's presence in the United States into an 'admission.'" (Id. at 1-2). Respondents also appear to submit the matter of whether a preliminary injunction should issue based upon their current briefing. (Id. at 2). Upon review of the record, the court adopts and incorporates the reasoning set forth in Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025) where the court held that the petitioner's prior release from immigration custody provided them with a liberty interest in continued release from immigration custody, and that due process required the petitioner's immediate release and a pre-deprivation hearing. Accordingly, petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 2 ), is hereby CONVERTED into a preliminary injunction and GRANTED as follows: (1) Respondents are ORDERED to immediately release petitioner from respondents' custody under the same conditions to which petitioner was subject prior to being re-detained; (2) Respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without providing petitioner notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge where respondents will have the burden to demonstrate that petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk. Under the circumstances of this case, petitioner will not be required to post bond pursuant to Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1 ), is referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for further proceedings. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 01/16/2026)
Jan 16, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO
#12
Jan 21, 2026
06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response
Main Document:
06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response
#15
Feb 10, 2026
Findings and Recommendations
Main Document:
Findings and Recommendations
#16
Feb 10, 2026
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
Main Document:
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm