Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00114

(HC) Zhong v. Warden, California City Correctional Center

Active

Case Information

Filed: January 08, 2026
Assigned to: Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to: Dennis M. Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity: January 09, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jan 08, 2026
(2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, San Francisco Field Office, Kristi Noem, Warden, California City Correctional Center by Ouyang Zhong. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 01/09/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jan 08, 2026
RECEIPT number 100006835: $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus from Ouyang Zhong. (Deputy Clerk OFR)
#2
Jan 09, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/12/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 01/09/2026)
Main Document: Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
#3
Jan 09, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/9/2026: Having reviewed the 1 Petition for Habeas Corpus filed in this case and in light of Petitioners request for release, the Court construes the petition as a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. It also appears that Petitioner may be entitled to relief. Petitioner asserts that he has been subject to a final order of removal since 1995 but that he was released in 2006 under an order of supervision. (ECF No. 1 at 2.) Petitioner alleges that he was taken back into custody on June 9, 2025, and has remained in custody ever since. (Id. at 2 -3.) Revocation of release is permissible if, on account of changed circumstances, the Service determines that there is a significant likelihood that the alien may be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future. 8 C.F.R. § 241.13(i)(2). Moreover, the removal period during which detention is permitted is generally limited to 90 days. See 8 U.S.C. § 1231; see also Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001). Petitioner asserts Respondents were previously unable to remove him to China and that he has been in custody for over 6 months during which the Respondents have been unable to remove him. Accordingly, on or before January 15, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there is a significant likelihood that Petitioner may be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future and why the Court should not grant Petitioners Motion. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1 ) on the United States Attorney. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/09/2026)
#4
Jan 09, 2026
CLERK'S NOTICE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Minute Order (ECF No. 3) served on the United States Attorney at usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/09/2026)
Jan 09, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Jan 09, 2026
Service by Mail
Jan 09, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Ouyang Zhong. (Deputy Clerk OFR)
Jan 09, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order (ECF No. 3) and Clerk's Notice (ECF No. 4) served on Ouyang Zhong. (Deputy Clerk GJM)

Parties

(HC) Zhong
Party
Warden, California City Correctional Center
Party