Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00120

#1

Jan 08, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Timothy S. Robbins, Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons by Parmjit Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12737280) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits A-D, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Jackson, Nneka) (Entered: 01/08/2026)

#2

Jan 08, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Consent or Decline due by 2/12/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk AML) (Entered: 01/08/2026)

#3

Jan 12, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jackson, Nneka) (Entered: 01/12/2026)

#4

Jan 13, 2026

Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#5

Feb 01, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Kristi Noem,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Timothy S. Robbins,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS),Jonathan Yu, GOVT for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/01/2026)

#6

Feb 01, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 02/01/2026)

#7

Feb 02, 2026

RESPONSE to 4 Order and ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by All Respondents. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 2/6/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 02/02/2026)

#8

Feb 05, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#9

Feb 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 8 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending motion for temporary restraining order. Further, no later than Monday, 2/9/2026, by 5:00 PM, petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the motion for temporary restraining order and accompanying papers, along with this order, to the United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of California by email at jonathan.yu@usdoj.gov and usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov; and (2) to promptly file proof of such service on the docket. The court observes that in their 7 response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus, respondents have conceded that "there are no substantial factual or legal issues that render this case distinguishable from this Court's prior decision in Rocha Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court." (Doc. No. 7 at 1). Accordingly, Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 8 motion for temporary restraining order or otherwise indicate that respondents oppose the 8 motion for temporary restraining order for the reasons outlined in their 7 answer to the petition by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, 2/10/2026. Respondents are also DIRECTED to indicate in their filing whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

Feb 06, 2026

Minute Order

#10

Feb 10, 2026

RESPONSE to 9 Minute Order and OPPOSITION to 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by All Respondents. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 2/18/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 02/10/2026)

#11

Feb 12, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#12

Feb 12, 2026

Judgment