Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-00074
(HC) Bhandari v. Chestnut
Active
Case Information
Filed: January 05, 2026
Assigned to:
Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to:
Dennis M. Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
January 13, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jan 05, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Jagesshor Bhandari. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12724518) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 01/05/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jan 06, 2026
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/9/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for DJ Presider
#3
Jan 06, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/6/2026: On January 5, 2026, Petitioner filed a 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner's prayer for relief includes a request that the court order Petitioner immediately released from custody. (ECF No. 1 at 19.) If Petitioner seeks emergency relief, Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a motion for temporary restraining order as soon as practicable, but no later than fourteen (14) days from this order. If no motion is filed in that time, this matter shall be referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(17). [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
#4
Jan 06, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jagesshor Bhandari. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration with Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order)(Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#5
Jan 06, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/6/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 4 ). The issues raised therein appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Singh v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-01543-DJC-SCR; Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Souza v. Robbins, No. 1:25-cv-01597-DJC-JDP. On or before January 8, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinct from the Court's prior orders in the cases listed above and would justify denial of a preliminary injunction. Respondents should also state whether they oppose this Court converting the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Petitioner may follow a reply on or before January 9, 2026. The matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. Petitioners counsel is DIRECTED to send a copy of the petition to the US Attorneys Office by January 7, 2026 at 10:00 A.M., at their email usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
Jan 06, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#6
Jan 08, 2026
RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 5 Minute Order, 4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Attorney Campbell, Charles added. (Campbell, Charles) (Entered: 01/08/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#7
Jan 08, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 1/8/2026: Given Respondents have not identified any material factual or legal issues in this case that render this case distinct from the prior cases cited in the Court's prior minute order (see ECF No. 6 at 1) and for the reasons stated in the orders in those prior cases (see ECF No. 5 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 4 ) is converted to a Motion for Preliminary Injunction and is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to immediately release Petitioner Jagesshor Bhandari from their custody. Respondents shall not impose any additional restrictions on him, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing. Respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, which include, at a minimum, pre-deprivation notice describing the change of circumstances necessitating his arrest and detention, and a timely hearing. At any such hearing, the Government shall bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner poses a danger to the community or a risk of flight, and Petitioner shall be allowed to have his counsel present. The merits of this matter are REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 01/08/2026)
Jan 08, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO
#8
Jan 13, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
Parties
Chestnut
Party
(HC) Bhandari
Party